data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45ee5/45ee56981d2b34fd421fb89e6db51bfe67263a8c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c10/86c106700befa0b2636eaa4a1f25292d6af37675" alt=""
I'm conflicted about these developments. It certainly makes sense to sacrifice intelligent machinery rather than to spill human blood, but there's a nagging worry that the manufacturers and purchasers of these new killing machines will need an excuse to use them. Or that they could be turned on domestic opponents of a particular political regime. One newly deployed robotic enforcer is specially designed for "crowd control," which raises some hackles as well.
Once we're over the novelty and ultra-coolness of sleek and capable programmable machines, we need to consider the implications of these devices on things like the ease of establishing a police state. And that's just not my paranoia talking. Former Reagan advisor Paul C. Roberts is actually sounding the alarm about Bush's intentions in that regard.
No comments:
Post a Comment