
So Tim's morphed into a web 2.0 guru these days, not an unexpected evolutionary advance. His blog: O'Reilly Radar is timely and authoritative. He recently defined the new frontier as: "Web 2.0 is the business revolution in the computer industry caused by the move to the internet as platform, and an attempt to understand the rules for success on that new platform. Chief among those rules is this: Build applications that harness network effects to get better the more people use them. (This is what I've elsewhere called 'harnessing collective intelligence.')". That begs the question: what does an application that has gotten "better" through harnessing network effects look like? Wikis come to mind. I wonder, however, if it is really the application that "gets better" through harnessing collective intelligence, or the quality of output? Maybe it's a moot point, and that's the point.
No comments:
Post a Comment